1. Business Foundation and Global Presence
- Establishment and Track Record: FundingPips is the more established entity, founded in 2022 and operating out of Dubai (UAE). It boasts a massive user base with over 44,000 Trustpilot reviews. Funded Trader Markets (FTM) is a newer entrant, founded in 2024 and based in Cyprus, with a significantly smaller but growing footprint.
- Regional Restrictions: Both firms have specific banned jurisdictions. Notably, FundingPips does not accept traders from the United States or the UAE, whereas Funded Trader Markets bans traders from Cyprus (its own HQ location) and several Middle Eastern countries, but currently permits US traders (subject to platform availability).
- Social Proof: FundingPips operates with a much higher level of transparency regarding its scale, while FTM is currently in its early growth phase, which may appeal to traders looking for newer, potentially more aggressive promotional offers.
2. Platform Ecosystem and Technical Infrastructure
- Platform Variety: Both firms offer MatchTrader, cTrader, and MetaTrader 5. However, Funded Trader Markets adds TradeLocker to its suite, providing an alternative for mobile-centric traders and those who prefer TradingView-integrated interfaces.
- Brokerage and Liquidity: Both firms utilize their own liquidity providers rather than traditional retail brokers, which is standard in the modern prop firm industry to ensure tighter control over spreads and execution.
- Asset Classes: The offerings are identical in scope, covering Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto.
- Swap-Free Trading: FTM offers swap-free accounts across all its models by default. FundingPips generally charges swaps, which increases the cost of holding positions overnight for swing traders.
3. Evaluation Models and Capital Allocation
- Complexity of Choice: Funded Trader Markets has a more complex product lineup, including various 1-step (Nitro, Nitro X, Nitro Pro), 2-step (Plus, Prime), and Instant Funding models. FundingPips offers a more streamlined approach with 1-step, 2-step, and their "Zero" (Instant) model.
- Max Allocation: Both firms have a similar ceiling for initial capital. FTM allows up to $1,800,000 in total across evaluation accounts. FundingPips caps initial allocation at $300,000, but offers a much more robust scaling plan that can reach up to $2,000,000.
- Refund Policy: Both firms offer a registration fee refund with the first payout. However, FTM restricts this to specific accounts (not available for Instant or Nitro X), while FundingPips applies it more broadly to their standard 1 and 2-step models.
4. Drawdown Mechanics and Risk Management
- Drawdown Types:
- 2-Step Models: Both firms use Static Drawdown for their 2-step evaluations, which is the most trader-friendly format as the limit does not move up with profits.
- 1-Step and Instant: FTM uses Trailing Drawdown for these models. FundingPips uses Static for its 1-step model and Trailing for its Zero (Instant) model. This makes FundingPips' 1-step evaluation significantly easier to manage than FTM’s.
- Daily Drawdown: Both firms calculate daily drawdown based on Equity/Balance at the end of the day (EOD), rather than a balance-based or "floating" equity drawdown that updates in real-time.
- Floating Loss Restrictions: This is a critical difference. FTM implements the Shield Risk Protocol on certain accounts (Plus/Prime), which triggers a breach or penalty if floating loss exceeds 1% of the balance. FundingPips has a rule where a single trade loss cannot exceed 3% of the account size on funded accounts. FTM's rule is more restrictive for intraday volatility, while FP's rule targets specific trade management.
5. Trading Rules and Restrictions
- Automated Trading (EAs): Funded Trader Markets allows the use of Expert Advisors. FundingPips explicitly prohibits EAs, making it a firm exclusively for manual traders.
- News Trading:
- FTM: Generally allows news trading, though consistency rules may apply.
- FundingPips: Has strict restrictions on funded accounts (excluding "On Demand" payouts). Profits from trades opened/closed 5 minutes around high-impact news are not counted. On the Zero model, news trading is a hard breach.
- Consistency Rules: Both firms use consistency rules to prevent "gambling" on single events. FTM uses a percentage cap (e.g., no single day can exceed 20-50% of total profit depending on the account). FundingPips applies a 35% consistency rule for On-Demand payouts and a 15% rule for its Zero model.
6. Payout Structure and Scaling
- Profit Split: FTM offers up to 100% profit split on Nitro X accounts, but typically ranges from 70% to 80%. FundingPips has a unique tiered system based on frequency: you can get 100% if you wait for a monthly payout, 90% for On-Demand, and as low as 60% for more frequent weekly requests.
- Payout Fees: FTM charges a 5% processing fee on Crypto payouts. FundingPips charges a flat $10 fee. For large withdrawals, FundingPips is significantly cheaper.
- Scaling Potential: FundingPips has one of the most detailed scaling plans in the industry, offering not only more capital (+20% to +40% increments) but also increasing the max drawdown limit (up to 13%) and daily drawdown as you level up. FTM lacks a formal scaling program, meaning your account size stays fixed regardless of performance.
7. Summary and Recommendations
Choose Funded Trader Markets if:
- You use Expert Advisors (EAs) to manage your trading.
- You prefer using TradeLocker or integrated TradingView platforms.
- You want Swap-Free accounts automatically.
- You are a US-based trader looking for specific platform access (subject to current status).
- You are interested in the Nitro X 100% profit split model, despite the higher activation fee and trailing drawdown.
Choose FundingPips if:
- You are a manual trader who values a firm with a massive, proven track record.
- You want a 1-step evaluation with Static Drawdown (rare and highly advantageous).
- You plan on growing a long-term career through a formal scaling plan that increases drawdown limits.
- You want the potential to earn 100% of profits by opting for monthly payout cycles.
- You trade from regions outside the US/UAE and prefer lower withdrawal fees ($10 flat vs 5% crypto fee).





















