Who is behind each firm
The corporate identity of these two firms represents different hubs of the modern proprietary trading industry. FundingPips is an established name in the sector, led by CEO Khaled Ayesh and operating from the IFZA Business Park in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Its presence is deeply rooted in the Middle Eastern financial technology landscape. On the other hand, Fundex is a newer participant based in Panama City, with offices located in the World Trade Center. While FundingPips relies on a centralized leadership figure, Fundex presents itself as a more institutional entity focused on its technological infrastructure, specifically its proprietary terminal integrated with providers like Bitunix for the crypto market.
How long they have been around
The difference in seniority is one of the most striking points of this comparison. FundingPips began its journey in 2022, a period that, in the fast-paced world of prop firms, grants it the status of a veteran. This longevity is supported by a massive volume of public feedback, exceeding 44,000 reviews on Trustpilot. Fundex is a 2025 creation, making it a very recent arrival to the market. This is reflected in its current volume of just 42 reviews. While FundingPips has had years to refine its rules and payout systems through thousands of cycles, Fundex is currently in its initial phase of establishing market trust and validating its operational promises.
What they promise and what backs it
FundingPips offers a wide range of models, including 1-Step, 2-Step, and "Zero" (instant) accounts, with prices that are highly competitive; for instance, their $100,000 2-Step Pro account is priced at $422. This aggressive pricing and a profit split that can reach 100% in certain cycles are backed by a three-year history and a massive community. Fundex, meanwhile, positions its 2-Step Classic $100,000 account at $529 and its Pro version at $749. Fundex backs its higher entry price with a specific focus on execution and risk management, implementing rules like a 3% maximum loss per trade during the evaluation. While FundingPips allows for more flexible styles and high leverage (up to 1:100 on Forex), Fundex limits Forex leverage to 1:100 but imposes stricter holding rules in its Classic model, such as the 3-minute minimum trade duration.
How they handle your money
The maturity of a firm is often seen in its payout infrastructure. FundingPips provides a highly diversified ecosystem, supporting transfers, crypto, and Rise, with payout frequencies that can be daily for its Prime and Labs 247 accounts. They also offer a refund of the initial fee with the first payout. Fundex focuses its payout strategy on speed through Rise, promising that most requests are processed within 60 minutes and all within 24 hours, including weekends. However, Fundex maintains a non-refundable fee policy once the account is accessed. Regarding platforms, FundingPips offers a more traditional and varied choice including MetaTrader 5, MatchTrader, and cTrader, whereas Fundex bets on MatchTrader and its own Proprietary Platform, signaling a move towards independence from third-party software providers.
Operational maturity
Operational maturity is evidenced by the complexity of the rules and the clarity of the terms. FundingPips shows a high level of detail in its scaling plans, which include five levels of progression and a "Prime" account for elite traders. It also has a well-defined points reward program and monthly competitions. Fundex demonstrates its maturity through a very specific "B-Book" and "A-Book" management policy described in its terms, where payouts are characterized as discretionary bonuses. Fundex also offers a free test account, which is a sign of confidence in its proprietary technology, whereas FundingPips relies on its extensive track record and its "Labs 247" model to offer continuous 24/7 trading, including weekends for crypto.
What the record does and does not tell you
The available data allows us to identify FundingPips as a high-volume, established firm with a diverse range of products and a large community that has tested its systems for years. Fundex appears as a modern alternative with a strong technological focus but a very short history that still needs to be corroborated by time. These records confirm the current scale and the longevity of the operations, but they do not guarantee future performance or the absolute safety of funds in either firm. The choice between a veteran with thousands of reviews and a newcomer with its own technology depends on the trader's priority: proven history or specific technological infrastructure.
Frequently asked questions
Which firm offers a cheaper $100,000 evaluation account, Fundex or FundingPips?
FundingPips is significantly more affordable for this account size. Its $100,000 2-Step Pro evaluation costs $422, and its 2-Step Standard model costs $522. In contrast, Fundex offers its $100,000 2-Step Classic at $529 and its 2-Step Pro at $749, placing its entry price above both FundingPips models.
Does Fundex or FundingPips provide a better profit split for the trader?
FundingPips offers a higher potential profit split, starting at 80% for most models and reaching up to 100% depending on the payout cycle (monthly). Fundex offers a 70% split on its Classic accounts and 80% on its Pro accounts, without reaching the 90% or 100% levels that FundingPips allows in its more advanced stages or specific models.
Which firm has more variety in trading platforms, Fundex or FundingPips?
FundingPips provides more variety by allowing traders to choose between MetaTrader 5, cTrader, and MatchTrader. Fundex focuses its offering on MatchTrader and its own Proprietary Platform (Fundex Terminal), which limits the choice for traders who specifically prefer the MetaTrader or cTrader ecosystems.
Which firm has a longer track record in the market, Fundex or FundingPips?
FundingPips has a much longer track record, having been founded in 2022 and accumulating over 44,000 reviews on Trustpilot. Fundex is a new firm founded in 2025, which at the time of this data has only 42 reviews, indicating a significantly shorter period of market presence and public feedback.























