Who is behind each firm
The leadership of these two entities reflects different stages of corporate visibility. FundingPips is led by its CEO, Khaled Ayesh, and operates from the IFZA Business Park in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. This firm has established a recognizable face in the industry, which often serves as a primary point of accountability for its community. On the other hand, Hyperticks is managed by the legal entity XTICKS SERVICES – FZCO, also based in Dubai (Silicon Oasis). While both firms share a geographical hub in the UAE, FundingPips leans on an individual leadership figure, whereas Hyperticks currently presents itself through its corporate structure, a common trait for newer entrants in the proprietary trading space.
How long they have been around
There is a significant gap in operational history between the two. FundingPips was founded in 2022, making it a veteran by the standards of the modern prop firm era. This longevity is reflected in a massive volume of public feedback, boasting approximately 44,000 reviews on Trustpilot. This data suggests a high level of stress-testing regarding its systems and payout processes over several years. Hyperticks is a very recent addition to the market, founded in 2025. With only 44 reviews recorded in the available data, Hyperticks is still in its infancy. While a lack of history does not imply a lack of quality, it does mean that its operational reliability has not yet been validated by the same scale of user experience that supports FundingPips.
What they promise and what backs it
FundingPips offers a wide variety of models, including 1-Step Flex, 2-Step Standard, and the "Zero" instant account. Their most aggressive promise is a profit split that can reach 100% for traders on a monthly payout cycle. This high reward is backed by a firm that has managed a large user base for three years. Their risk rules are detailed, using static or trailing drawdowns depending on the account, and they allow EAs with specific ownership proof. Hyperticks enters the market with very competitive pricing on certain plans, such as the Beginner Max $100k account for $238, and offers up to a 90% profit split. However, Hyperticks imposes more restrictive rules to balance its risk, such as a mandatory 2-minute minimum trade duration and specific consistency rules (35% to 40% on some plans). The promises made by Hyperticks are bold, but they are currently backed by a much smaller track record and a more restrictive set of trading conditions compared to the more flexible environment found in FundingPips.
How they handle your money
The maturity of a firm is often visible in its financial infrastructure. FundingPips utilizes a broad range of payment methods, including Card, Crypto, PayPal, Neteller, and Skrill, which indicates a sophisticated integration with global payment processors. Their payouts are handled via Rise, Crypto, or Transfer, with a relatively low $10 fee. In terms of platforms, they offer MetaTrader 5, cTrader, and MatchTrader. Hyperticks, being newer, has a more focused financial setup, accepting Card, Crypto, and PayPal, while payouts are limited to Rise and Crypto. Notably, Hyperticks charges a higher fee of $35 for Rise payouts. Their platform selection is highly specialized, moving away from MetaTrader to offer Volumetrica, TradingView, ATAS, and DeepCharts, which suggests they are targeting a more technical or order-flow oriented trader.
Operational maturity
Operational maturity is evidenced by the complexity of the services offered. FundingPips demonstrates this through its "Prime" scaling plan and a monthly competition that can host up to 50,000 participants, showing they have the infrastructure to manage large-scale events and long-term trader growth. Their support for multiple currencies and a wide array of assets, including stocks, further points to a robust technical setup. Hyperticks shows its maturity through a highly specific set of "Buffer" requirements and qualifying day rules (such as 10 days for the first payout on certain accounts). While Hyperticks' rules are more complex, they represent a cautious approach to risk management for a new firm. FundingPips feels like a broad retail solution, while Hyperticks appears as a specialized niche for traders who prefer advanced charting platforms over traditional retail software.
What the record does and does not tell you
The track record provides a clear view of market presence and user trust but has its limits. In the case of FundingPips, the 44,000 reviews confirm that the firm has processed a significant volume of trades and payouts, which reduces the uncertainty for new users. However, a large history does not guarantee future performance or immunity to market changes. For Hyperticks, the small number of reviews and recent foundation date mean that the firm is still proving its solvency and operational capacity. The data allows us to confirm that FundingPips is an established player and Hyperticks is a newcomer with a technical focus, but it cannot predict the long-term stability of either firm beyond what their current rules and infrastructure suggest.
Frequently asked questions
Which firm is more affordable for a $100,000 evaluation, FundingPips or Hyperticks?
Hyperticks is significantly more affordable for a $100,000 account if you choose their "Beginner Max" plan, which costs $238. In contrast, the FundingPips 1-Step Flex evaluation for the same $100,000 size is priced at $569. However, it is important to note that the Hyperticks plan comes with much stricter rules, including a 30-day evaluation limit and a mandatory profit buffer before the first payout, whereas FundingPips offers more flexible trading conditions.
Which firm offers a higher maximum profit split, FundingPips or Hyperticks?
FundingPips offers the highest potential profit split, reaching up to 100% for traders who choose a monthly payout cycle on their 2-Step Standard or Pro accounts. Hyperticks offers a very competitive maximum split of 90% on several of its plans, such as Beginner Max and the Hyper Lite/Pro series. While both are high, FundingPips provides the only path to keeping the entire profit generated, albeit under specific payout frequency conditions.
What are the differences in payout fees and methods between FundingPips and Hyperticks?
FundingPips has a more versatile and cheaper payout system, charging a $10 fee and offering Rise, Crypto, and Bank Transfers. Hyperticks is more limited and expensive in this regard, offering only Rise and Crypto for withdrawals, with a $35 fee specifically for Rise payouts. Additionally, FundingPips supports a wider range of deposit methods, including Neteller and Skrill, which are not available at Hyperticks.
Which firm is better for traders who use MetaTrader 5, FundingPips or Hyperticks?
FundingPips is the only choice for traders who require MetaTrader 5, as it is one of their primary platforms alongside cTrader and MatchTrader. Hyperticks does not offer MetaTrader at all, focusing instead on specialized platforms like TradingView, Volumetrica, and ATAS. Therefore, if your trading strategy or EAs are built specifically for the MetaTrader environment, FundingPips is the compatible option.
