1. Corporate Profile and Reliability
- Establishment and Longevity: FundingPips was founded in 2022 and has established a significant footprint in the industry with a massive review base. Sure Leverage Funding is a newer entrant (2023). Both are headquartered in the United Arab Emirates but under different jurisdictions (Dubai vs. Ras Al Khaimah).
- Geographical Restrictions: FundingPips has a more restrictive policy regarding major markets, explicitly banning residents of the United States and the UAE. Sure Leverage, while banning various high-risk jurisdictions, allows for a broader reach but applies a $50,000 funding cap to traders from Malaysia and Vietnam.
- Leadership and Transparency: Both firms operate with public CEOs (Khaled Ayesh for FundingPips and Sebastian Ness for Sure Leverage), which provides a layer of accountability often missing in the prop firm space.
2. Evaluation Models and Capital Access
- Diversity of Programs: FundingPips offers a streamlined selection focusing on 1-Step, 2-Step, and the "Zero" (Instant) models. Sure Leverage Funding provides a wider variety of specialized products, including an EA-specific challenge and a "Buy Now, Pay Later" model that allows traders to enter for as low as $10.
- Capital Allocation: Both firms have a similar maximum initial allocation ceiling around $300,000 to $400,000. However, FundingPips offers a more aggressive scaling plan that can theoretically lead to $2,000,000 in capital, making it more suitable for long-term professional traders.
- Entry Costs: Looking at the standard 2-Step evaluation, FundingPips is generally more aggressive on pricing (e.g., $100k account for
$529) compared to Sure Leverage ($359 for a 2-Phase), though Sure Leverage provides cheaper entry points for smaller accounts and promotional models.
3. Trading Conditions and Platform Technology
- Trading Terminals: Both firms support MetaTrader 5 and MatchTrader. FundingPips offers cTrader, which is a favorite for technical traders, while Sure Leverage provides TradeLocker, catering to mobile-centric and modern UI preferences.
- Leverage Flexibility: FundingPips offers higher leverage for experienced traders on their 2-Step accounts (100:1), whereas Sure Leverage limits funded phase leverage to 1:30. This makes FundingPips more attractive for strategies requiring high margin efficiency, while Sure Leverage imposes a more conservative risk environment.
- Asset Classes: Both firms cover the essentials (Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto). A key difference is in the crypto trading weekend policy: Sure Leverage allows weekend trading, whereas FundingPips does not, which is a critical factor for dedicated crypto traders.
4. Drawdown Logic and Risk Management
- Daily Drawdown Calculation: This is a crucial area of divergence. FundingPips utilizes an End-of-Day (EOD) High-Watermark based on the higher of balance or equity. This is generally more "trader-friendly" as it doesn't penalize intra-day floating profits as much as a real-time trailing drawdown.
- Maximum Drawdown: FundingPips uses a static drawdown for its 1 and 2-Step accounts, meaning the loss limit never moves up. In contrast, Sure Leverage uses a trailing high-watermark for its 1-Step and EA challenges, which is significantly harder to manage as the "floor" rises with your profits.
- Hard Breaches: Sure Leverage mandates a Stop Loss on funded accounts (within 5 minutes of entry), a rule FundingPips does not enforce. However, FundingPips has a strict 3% maximum loss per trade (idea) rule on funded accounts, which serves as a hard breach.
5. Payouts and Profit Sharing
- Profit Split Potential: FundingPips offers a dynamic split starting at 60% up to 100% through their scaling levels. Sure Leverage typically sits at an 80% split, which can be boosted via paid add-ons.
- Refund Policy: FundingPips provides a full refund with the first payout. Sure Leverage has a much stricter policy where refunds are only issued on the fourth payout, and only for accounts purchased after early 2026. This makes FundingPips the better choice for traders looking to recoup their initial investment quickly.
- Consistency Rules: Both firms implement consistency rules to prevent "gambling" for a single payout. FundingPips limits any single day to 35% of total profit (On Demand), while Sure Leverage is stricter at 25% (most accounts) or 20% (Pro models).
6. Prohibited Strategies and News Trading
- News Trading: FundingPips is more restrictive on funded accounts, enforcing a 5-minute window around high-impact news where profits are not counted (unless the trade was open for 5 hours). Sure Leverage generally allows news trading without these specific time-based profit restrictions.
- Expert Advisors (EAs): There is a massive difference here. FundingPips prohibits EAs entirely. Sure Leverage offers a specific EA Challenge where they are allowed during the evaluation phase, though they remain prohibited once the account is funded.
- Copy Trading: Both firms allow copy trading from the trader's own accounts, but strictly prohibit third-party services.
7. Summary of Differences: Which Firm to Choose?
Choose FundingPips if:
- You are a manual trader who prefers cTrader or MT5.
- You want a Static Max Drawdown and EOD Daily Drawdown to give your trades more breathing room.
- Your goal is to reach 100% profit split and manage millions in capital through a structured scaling plan.
- You want your initial fee refunded immediately upon your first successful payout.
- You are not a resident of the USA or UAE.
Choose Sure Leverage Funding if:
- You want to use EAs during the evaluation phase (via the EA Challenge).
- You want to trade Crypto during the weekend.
- You are a high-volume trader who doesn't mind a mandatory Stop Loss but wants the freedom to trade news without profit restrictions.
- You have a very limited budget and want to utilize the "Buy Now, Pay Later" entry model.
- You are an American trader (as they are not on the banned list for this firm).




















