FundingPips launches Labs 004 Ultimate: a one-step $25,000 account with unlimited daily rewards
Upcomers brings Horizon to futures: a one-step evaluation with no consistency rule
E8 Markets rebuilds its E8 Terminal with Trader Score, journaling and a News Wire
Finotive drops one-sided trading and volume limits on Instant Funding Standard and Lite
Lark Funding adds XAUUSD247 for 24/7 gold trading
Hola Prime Publishes 12 Months of Payout Data Reviewed by Deloitte
Iceberg Launches 1-Step Pro: One-Phase Evaluation With a 12% Target From $35
Leveraged launches Instant and Nitro, two accounts with no evaluation
Blueberry Funded launches its first synthetic indices competition
Funded Trader Markets Launches FTM Perps with 24/7 Trading on 293 Markets
FundedNext Cuts Minimum Trading Days to 2 Across All Stellar Lite Payout CyclesFinotive Funding raises leverage on FX, indices, metals and crypto
OneFunded launches a free 14-day trial with a simulated $100,000 accountHola Prime switches 2-Step Fly Maximum Loss Limit to intraday trailing in Sim. Funded
IQ Capital launches a trading competition with $200,000 in prizes
My Funded Perps
25% off
Affiliate link · your price stays the same
- Country
- United States
- Founded
- 2026
- Max allocation
- $300K
- Platforms
- Propietary Platform
My Funded Perps 4.5 My Funded Perps: Real user reviews report
No community reviews for My Funded Perps yet
Meanwhile we show the analysis of external reviews (Trustpilot and similar). Have you traded with this firm? Be the first to share your experience.
Cost vs Value
4.8Value perception is very high due to competitive pricing, 'TradeCases' (gamification) that grant free accounts, and the possibility of participating in competitions at no cost.
Technical Support
4.9Technical support is excellent and personalized. Several team members are mentioned by name, highlighting their speed on Discord and live chat, even outside business hours.
Payment Reliability
4.9This is the firm's strongest aspect. Users report withdrawals processed in minutes (via Rise) and exceptional efficiency in their approval, delivering as promised.
Evaluation Rules
4.6Rules are perceived as fair and simple, especially the use of static drawdown and the absence of consistency rules. However, there are specific complaints about suspensions for 'gambling' or algorithmic use without clear explanations.
Trading Conditions
4.7Trading conditions are highly rated, highlighting low spreads, excellent execution, and a smooth UI tailored for perpetual trading. Some users mention occasional lag, but most highlight the quality of the custom terminal.
Transparency
4.5The firm enjoys a good reputation as it is backed by MyFundedFutures. While transparent, some users criticize that certain risk rules are 'hidden' in the FAQ and not evident upon purchase.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opinion Distribution
The vast majority of users are delighted with the speed of payments and the simplicity of the rules. They highly value the possibility of trading crypto 24/7.
They focus on minor technical issues such as chart lag or verification processes that take a bit longer than expected.
Negative reviews come from algorithmic or high-frequency traders whose accounts were suspended for 'exploiting' the simulated environment, complaining about the lack of feedback.
Recurring Topics
Company Response
No official firm responses are included in the provided dataset, although users mention very positive interactions on external channels.
Review Authenticity
The reviews appear authentic. Although there is a high volume of 5-star ratings, this seems to be driven by a gamification system (TradeCases) that encourages organic community participation.
Popular Countries
Popular Plans
Frequently Asked Questions
We collect and analyze reviews from verified internet platforms. This allows us to offer you a complete and objective view based on real trader experiences.
We use advanced text analysis technology to process thousands of opinions and extract relevant insights. We identify recurring patterns, strengths and weaknesses, and generate category scores based on the general sentiment expressed by real users.
We prioritize sources that require identity verification or demonstrable history, such as platforms with verification systems and active users in established communities. Additionally, we apply filters to detect and exclude suspicious reviews or spam.
We regularly update our analyses to reflect the most recent opinions. We continuously monitor new reviews and update scores when we detect significant changes in general sentiment or new important patterns.
