The platform is great but the trading terminal ain't great they should be available on mt5
Breaking
E8 Markets rebuilds its E8 Terminal with Trader Score, journaling and a News Wire
Finotive drops one-sided trading and volume limits on Instant Funding Standard and Lite
Lark Funding adds XAUUSD247 for 24/7 gold trading
Hola Prime Publishes 12 Months of Payout Data Reviewed by Deloitte
Iceberg Launches 1-Step Pro: One-Phase Evaluation With a 12% Target From $35
Leveraged launches Instant and Nitro, two accounts with no evaluation
Blueberry Funded launches its first synthetic indices competition
Funded Trader Markets Launches FTM Perps with 24/7 Trading on 293 Markets
FundedNext Cuts Minimum Trading Days to 2 Across All Stellar Lite Payout CyclesFinotive Funding raises leverage on FX, indices, metals and crypto
OneFunded launches a free 14-day trial with a simulated $100,000 accountHola Prime switches 2-Step Fly Maximum Loss Limit to intraday trailing in Sim. Funded
IQ Capital launches a trading competition with $200,000 in prizes
Goat Funded Trader launches an AI Trading Mentor that reviews your tradesGoat Funded Trader Launches the 2 Step Premium ChallengeAll news
E8 Markets rebuilds its E8 Terminal with Trader Score, journaling and a News WireFinotive drops one-sided trading and volume limits on Instant Funding Standard and LiteLark Funding adds XAUUSD247 for 24/7 gold tradingHola Prime Publishes 12 Months of Payout Data Reviewed by DeloitteIceberg Launches 1-Step Pro: One-Phase Evaluation With a 12% Target From $35Leveraged launches Instant and Nitro, two accounts with no evaluationBlueberry Funded launches its first synthetic indices competitionFunded Trader Markets Launches FTM Perps with 24/7 Trading on 293 MarketsFundedNext Cuts Minimum Trading Days to 2 Across All Stellar Lite Payout CyclesFinotive Funding raises leverage on FX, indices, metals and cryptoOneFunded launches a free 14-day trial with a simulated $100,000 accountHola Prime switches 2-Step Fly Maximum Loss Limit to intraday trailing in Sim. FundedIQ Capital launches a trading competition with $200,000 in prizesGoat Funded Trader launches an AI Trading Mentor that reviews your tradesGoat Funded Trader Launches the 2 Step Premium Challenge
RebelsFunding
4.1 1 review
4.4
Trading Conditions 3.8
Evaluation Rules 3.6
Payment Reliability 4.6
Cost vs Value 4.4
Transparency 3.7
Technical Support 4.3
Trading Conditions 3.8
Evaluation Rules 4.3
Payment Reliability 4.7
Cost vs Value 4.8
Transparency 4.1
Technical Support 4.6
Exclusive code
30% off
Affiliate link · your price stays the same
- Country
- Slovakia
- Founded
- 2023
- Payouts every
- Bi-weekly
- Max allocation
- $640K
- Platforms
- Propietary Platform
RebelsFunding 4.1 30% off
RebelsFunding: Community reviews
RebelsFunding external reviews analysis
Popularity
4/ 5Cost vs Value
4.8The perception of value is excellent due to its competitive prices, especially the $1k challenges and the low-cost Silver program. Free competitions to win accounts are also mentioned positively.
Technical Support
4.6Support is highly efficient, with responses within minutes through live chat. Even in negative reviews, users usually acknowledge that the customer service team responds quickly and professionally.
Payment Reliability
4.7This is one of the strongest points. Multiple reviews confirm fast payouts (some in less than 5 hours) and no complications after passing KYC and account audit verifications.
Evaluation Rules
4.3Users positively value the absence of consistency rules and the clarity of objectives. The 'Copper' (4 phases) and 'Silver' programs are very popular among beginners, though there are isolated complaints about denials after passing due to subjective manual reviews.
Trading Conditions
3.8Trading conditions are generally well-received, highlighting low spreads and TradingView integration. However, there is a clear divide regarding the proprietary platform (RF-Trader); while some value its risk management tools, others criticize lags, disconnections, and the lack of MT5.
Transparency
4.1The firm enjoys a good reputation and is transparent about its business models (A-book vs B-book). However, geographic restrictions (such as in Pakistan) and the post-challenge 'manual review' process generate some distrust among certain users.
Strengths
✓Fast payout processing
✓Affordable prices and beginner programs
Weaknesses
✗Instability of the proprietary RF-Trader platform
✗Post-evaluation manual review process
Opinion Distribution
Positive
5★ - 4★Most users are delighted with the speed of payouts and the friendliness of support. They value the lack of restrictive rules like consistency and the low entry prices.
Neutral
3★They focus on the platform. Many consider the company good but feel the trading software needs technical optimization to avoid delays in scalping.
Negative
2★ - 1★The main complaints come from users whose accounts were denied after passing the challenge due to 'unsuitable trading styles' or technical connection issues during news.
Recurring Topics
Massive request for MetaTrader 5 (MT5) integrationConnection issues and lag in the mobile appRestriction of users from PakistanPositive feedback on the integrated risk calculator
Company Response
Very high. The firm responds to almost all reviews with detailed explanations, even strongly defending its business model against scam accusations.
Review Authenticity
The reviews appear authentic. There is a large presence of traders from Nigeria and South Africa, which is common for this firm. The detailed responses from the company to criticisms reinforce the legitimacy of the feedback.
Popular Countries
NigeriaSouth AfricaSlovakiaIndiaKenya
Popular Plans
Copper program (4-phase)Silver program1k Affordable programs80k Silver Challenge
Frequently Asked Questions
We collect and analyze reviews from verified internet platforms. This allows us to offer you a complete and objective view based on real trader experiences.
We use advanced text analysis technology to process thousands of opinions and extract relevant insights. We identify recurring patterns, strengths and weaknesses, and generate category scores based on the general sentiment expressed by real users.
We prioritize sources that require identity verification or demonstrable history, such as platforms with verification systems and active users in established communities. Additionally, we apply filters to detect and exclude suspicious reviews or spam.
We regularly update our analyses to reflect the most recent opinions. We continuously monitor new reviews and update scores when we detect significant changes in general sentiment or new important patterns.
