As an active futures trader, I appreciate The5ers’ scaling plans, which offer a structured path toward larger funded accounts as traders meet performance goals. Its emphasis on risk management and long-term development aligns with my focus on consistency, disciplined execution, and sustainable trading rather than chasing quick profits.The5ers is worth considering for traders who value structured funding opportunities, risk awareness, and the potential for long-term account growth. As with any prop firm, I recommend carefully reviewing the specific program rules, drawdown calculations, payout conditions, and scaling requirements before purchasing an evaluation.
The5ers Futures
10% off
Affiliate link · your price stays the same
- Country
- Israel
- Founded
- 2016
- Max allocation
- $500K
- Platforms
- BlackArrow
The5ers Futures 4.5 The5ers Futures: Community reviews
This firm is known for its good service and transparency in payments.and has a pretty good track record over the years, but for me it's still too difficult to follow the existing rules hahaha... especially the candle movement on the MT5 platform which is too wild, it made me quite shocked..
This pf have good reviews, and I'm interested to buy a challenge on it for my first time. So I believe, I can pass untill payout
The5ers has the best instant customer services support team in the propfirm industry. Instant reply 24/7. And that, makes it a number one choice for both professionals and newbies who look forward to use propfirms as a tool to level up in their forex trading journey.
The5ers Futures external reviews analysis
Popularity
5/ 5Cost vs Value
4.6Excellent perception of value. Prices are considered affordable and competitive compared to firms like FTMO, coupled with a scaling plan that users consider real and achievable.
Technical Support
4.4Support is one of the highest-rated points for its speed and friendliness. Although there are complaints about delays in the KYC process and unsatisfactory responses to technical platform failures.
Payment Reliability
4.1Most report fast and problem-free payouts. However, the score is affected by cases where withdrawals are withheld due to failed compliance interviews or suspicions of 'coordinated trading'.
Evaluation Rules
4.5The rules are perceived as transparent and fair. The 2-step 'High Stakes' plan is very popular. Some traders positively value the 3-day minimum profit rule for encouraging discipline.
Trading Conditions
4.2Users highlight extremely smooth order execution and competitive spreads, especially in Forex. However, there are specific complaints about spreads on indices (US30) not matching advertised rates and high commissions on certain assets.
Transparency
3.9They enjoy an 'OG firm' (pioneer) reputation. However, there are recent criticisms regarding the lack of transparency in the reasons for account termination following risk interviews.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opinion Distribution
Users with 4-5 stars value the company's longevity, payout speed, and the absence of hidden rules under normal conditions.
3-star reviews usually come from long-term users noting a decline in customer treatment or technical issues with the new interface.
1-2 star criticisms are concentrated on account blocks due to IP issues, failed voice interviews, and KYC denials.
Recurring Topics
Company Response
High. The firm responds with technical arguments based on server logs and specific contractual terms.
Review Authenticity
Authenticity seems legitimate overall. There is a pattern of users mentioning an external account-passing service on Telegram, which is common in the industry. Negative reviews are detailed, and the firm's responses confirm the existence of the cases.
Popular Countries
Popular Plans
Frequently Asked Questions
We collect and analyze reviews from verified internet platforms. This allows us to offer you a complete and objective view based on real trader experiences.
We use advanced text analysis technology to process thousands of opinions and extract relevant insights. We identify recurring patterns, strengths and weaknesses, and generate category scores based on the general sentiment expressed by real users.
We prioritize sources that require identity verification or demonstrable history, such as platforms with verification systems and active users in established communities. Additionally, we apply filters to detect and exclude suspicious reviews or spam.
We regularly update our analyses to reflect the most recent opinions. We continuously monitor new reviews and update scores when we detect significant changes in general sentiment or new important patterns.
















