1. Business Profile and Reliability
Finotive and QT Funded represent two different generations and geographic hubs within the prop firm industry.
- Establishment: Finotive has been operating since 2021 from Cyprus, giving it a longer track record in the market. QT Funded is a newer entrant (2023) based in South Africa.
- Leadership: Both firms have visible CEOs (Oliver Newland for Finotive and Tanswell Sassman for QT Funded), which generally contributes to higher institutional transparency.
- Geographic Restrictions: Both firms are restrictive regarding the United States, Iran, and North Korea. QT Funded also explicitly bans residents of Cyprus and Russia.
2. Platform Diversity and Technology
The technical infrastructure offers distinct advantages depending on the trader's preferred interface.
- Trading Platforms: QT Funded offers significantly more variety with MetaTrader 5, cTrader, and TradeLocker. Finotive is strictly limited to MetaTrader 5. This makes QT Funded a better choice for traders moving away from MetaQuotes software.
- Brokerage: Both firms use in-house or specialized brokers (Finotive Markets vs. Quant Tekel).
- Demo Access: Both firms provide public credentials for demo accounts, allowing traders to test spreads and execution before committing capital—a high standard for transparency.
3. Evaluation Models and Capital Access
The structure of the challenges varies in complexity and speed of funding.
- Step Structure: Finotive focuses on 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations. QT Funded adds a 3-Step evaluation (Prime Three Step), which allows for a lower entry price for traders with tighter budgets.
- Instant Funding: Both firms offer "Instant Funding" options, skipping the evaluation phase. However, Finotive offers two tiers (Standard and Lite), while QT Funded uses a trailing drawdown model for its Instant accounts, which is generally more restrictive than Finotive’s static drawdown.
- The "Pro" Concept: Finotive offers a Pro Challenge that allows for a 100% profit split and a monthly salary, but it comes with much stricter consistency rules.
4. Trading Rules and Restrictions
This is the most critical area where the two firms diverge, impacting different trading styles.
- News Trading: Finotive allows news trading without explicit restrictions. QT Funded imposes a 5-minute "no-trade" window before and after high-impact news (except for the QT Prime On Demand account). Violating this can lead to profit deductions.
- Expert Advisors (EAs): Finotive allows EAs as long as they aren't "plug-and-play" mass-market bots. QT Funded requires a pre-approval process for any EA, which adds a layer of bureaucracy for algorithmic traders.
- Risk Management: Finotive requires a Stop Loss. QT Funded also requires a Stop Loss to be placed within 60 seconds of opening a trade on funded accounts.
- Consistency Rules: QT Funded applies a 35% consistency rule (no single day can account for more than 35% of total profit for a payout). Finotive only applies consistency rules to its Pro accounts (±25% volume/trade count deviation).
5. Leverage and Margin
- Forex: Finotive offers up to 100:1 on standard 2-step challenges. QT Funded is capped at 50:1.
- Asset Sensitivity: Finotive reduces leverage significantly for metals and indices (20:1 or 10:1). QT Funded maintains a more consistent but lower leverage across the board (15:1 for metals).
- Position Exposure: Finotive has a unique "Max Exposure" rule based on notional volume. Exceeding these limits results in "Strikes." Three strikes on a funded account lead to a 10% reduction in the next payout.
6. Payouts and Profit Sharing
- Minimum Withdrawal: Finotive has an extremely low minimum withdrawal of $4. QT Funded requires at least $100, and for some accounts, you must reach a 3% to 5% profit threshold before being eligible for an "On Demand" payout.
- Profit Split: Finotive defaults to 70%-80% (scaling to 95%). QT Funded starts at 80% but allows an upgrade to 90% via an add-on at checkout.
- Salary Feature: Finotive offers a unique "Salary" of 1% of purchased capital per month, paid daily, regardless of whether you trade that day, provided the account is active. This is a rare feature in the industry that provides a small guaranteed cash flow.
7. Drawdown and Scaling
- Daily Drawdown: Both firms use balance-based daily drawdown, which is generally more trader-friendly than equity-based drawdown as it ignores floating profits from previous days.
- Max Drawdown: Finotive uses a static drawdown (does not move with balance). QT Funded uses static drawdown for its Prime/Power accounts but uses trailing drawdown for Instant accounts, making those accounts significantly harder to maintain as the "buffer" moves up with your profits.
- Scaling Plan: Finotive increases the balance by 30% every 90 days. QT Funded also offers scaling but focuses more on increasing the profit split via add-ons.
8. Summary and Final Recommendations
Choose Finotive if:
- You want a monthly salary (1% of capital) in addition to your trading profits.
- You trade high-impact news and don't want to worry about 5-minute restriction windows.
- You need high leverage (100:1) for Forex trading.
- You value a very low minimum withdrawal ($4).
- You prefer a static drawdown on all account types, including Instant Funding.
Choose QT Funded if:
- You prefer using cTrader or TradeLocker instead of MetaTrader 5.
- You want the option of a 3-Step Challenge to minimize your initial financial risk.
- You are willing to pay for Add-ons to get a 90% profit split or a Phase 2 reset.
- You don't mind a 35% consistency rule and can manage your position sizes to avoid "big lucky days" that exceed the cap.
- You want a firm with a presence in the South African market and diversified payment methods like PayPal.




















