1. Business Foundation and Transparency
Both firms were established in 2023, positioning them as relatively new players in the industry. However, their operational bases and transparency levels differ:
- QT Funded operates from South Africa and maintains a high level of public trust with a Trustpilot score of 4.5 and over 12,000 reviews, indicating a large, active user base.
- Upcomers is based in the United Arab Emirates (Dubai). Notably, its Trustpilot is currently blocked, which is a significant red flag for traders seeking verified external feedback, although they do report approximately 450 reviews.
- Geographic Restrictions: Upcomers has a much more extensive list of banned countries, including the UAE itself, whereas QT Funded focuses its restrictions on high-risk jurisdictions like North Korea, Russia, and Syria.
2. Allocation Limits and Scalability
For traders looking to manage significant capital, the difference in "ceiling" is substantial:
- QT Funded: Offers a total max allocation of $400,000. While they allow account merging, no single merged account can exceed $200,000. This makes it a firm more suited for mid-tier retail traders.
- Upcomers: Provides a much higher capital ceiling with a total funded limit of $1,500,000. Furthermore, their scaling plan is aggressive, allowing traders to reach up to $4,000,000 through 35% balance increases every 4 months.
- Consequence: Upcomers is clearly designed for "pro" traders or those aiming for institutional-sized simulation accounts, while QT Funded keeps a more conservative risk profile regarding total exposure per trader.
3. Evaluation Models and Program Variety
Upcomers offers a vastly more complex ecosystem of programs compared to QT Funded’s structured approach:
- QT Funded Programs: Focuses on 1, 2, and 3-step evaluations, plus an "Instant" model. Their structures are traditional, with profit targets ranging from 5% to 8% depending on the phase.
- Upcomers Programs: Features a high variety of specialized paths:
- Classic/Turbo: From 1/2-step to 5-step evaluations (Eon).
- Legacy: Programs with Static Drawdown instead of trailing.
- High-Speed Sessions: Supernova (24h) and Hypernova (4h) sessions for traders who want to get funded or fail in a single day.
- Risk Note: Upcomers' 4h/24h programs are extremely high-risk "gamified" models that require 7 trades in a very short window, favoring high-frequency styles that are banned in their other programs.
4. Drawdown Mechanics: Trailing vs. Static
Understanding how these firms calculate failure is critical for account longevity:
- QT Funded: Uses Balance-based daily drawdown. For their Prime and Power accounts, the maximum drawdown is Static, meaning it stays fixed at the starting level. However, their Instant accounts use a Trailing drawdown, which is more restrictive as the floor moves up with your profits.
- Upcomers: Implements a tiered drawdown system.
- Static Drawdown: Used in evaluation phases, which is safer for the trader.
- Dynamic Risk Shield™: A trailing drawdown that follows equity (High-Water Mark) but locks permanently at the starting balance once the profit target is hit. This is a unique hybrid that protects the firm during growth but offers security to the trader once the account is established.
5. Payout Structure and Hidden Costs
While both firms offer high profit splits, the "fine print" on withdrawals is where they diverge most:
- Profit Split: QT Funded offers 80% to 100% (on Prime On Demand). Upcomers offers a nearly industry-leading 99% split, but this comes with significant friction.
- Withdrawal Caps (Upcomers): New funded traders at Upcomers face a progressive cap. Your first withdrawal is limited to only 1% of the initial balance, scaling slowly up to the 7th withdrawal. You only get unlimited payouts from the 8th withdrawal onwards.
- Withdrawal Fees: QT Funded has a standard $100 minimum. Upcomers charges significant fees: $19.90 + 2.49% for bank transfers and a staggering $19.90 + 30% for Crypto due to UAE liquidity issues.
- Consequence: While 99% profit split sounds superior, the progressive caps and high transaction fees at Upcomers mean that a QT Funded trader might actually pocket more liquid cash in their first few months of consistency.
6. Trading Rules and Strategy Restrictions
- Expert Advisors (EAs): QT Funded allows EAs but requires a pre-approval process. Upcomers strictly prohibits all EAs, bots, and automation, including partial management of entries or exits.
- News Trading: Upcomers allows news trading. QT Funded has a 5-minute "no-trade" window before and after high-impact news (except for their Prime On Demand accounts).
- Risk Limits: Both have "Hard Breach" rules for risk. QT Funded requires a Stop Loss within 60 seconds of opening a trade. Upcomers has a Max Single Trade Loss (e.g., 3% for Classic accounts), which if exceeded, results in immediate account closure.
- Consistency: Both use consistency rules. QT Funded sets a 35% ceiling for a single day's profit, whereas Upcomers is stricter at 20% (Best Day Rule) for most accounts.
7. Summary: Which Firm to Choose?
Choose QT Funded if:
- You prioritize verified reputation and transparent Trustpilot feedback.
- You use Expert Advisors (with approval) or require a simple, standard withdrawal process without progressive caps.
- You prefer a firm with a local broker (Quant Tekel) and more traditional, predictable rules.
- You are a retail trader focusing on accounts between $10,000 and $200,000.
Choose Upcomers if:
- You are an extremely high-volume or professional trader aiming for the $1.5M - $4M allocation range.
- You trade manually and do not use any form of automation.
- You want the 99% profit split and are willing to wait through 7 withdrawals to unlock unlimited payout capacity.
- You are interested in Static Drawdown evaluation phases or "Speed-funding" sessions (24h/4h) and understand the high risks involved.
- You are comfortable with high withdrawal fees in exchange for higher theoretical profit shares.




















