Who is behind each firm
QT Funded is led by CEO Tanswell Sassman and operates from Cape Town, South Africa. The firm has reached a level of institutional size that allowed it to announce the acquisition of Titan Capital Markets in October 2026, a move aimed at consolidating its community. On the other side, Velotrade is based in Hong Kong and is led by Gianluca Pizzituti. While QT Funded follows a more traditional corporate expansion model, Velotrade positions itself as a firm deeply integrated with modern financial technology, focusing its operations on transparency through blockchain verification.
How long they have been around
There is a significant gap in seniority and public footprint between the two. QT Funded was founded in 2023 and has accumulated over 13,380 reviews on Trustpilot, suggesting a high volume of user traffic and a tested operational structure. Velotrade is a much younger entity, founded in 2025. Its public record is currently minimal, with only 8 reviews on Trustpilot and a "blocked" status on that specific review platform, which indicates a very early stage of market entry or a different approach to public reputation management.
What they promise and what backs it
QT Funded offers a wide range of plans, including the "QT Power" and "QT TWO" evaluations, and even an "Instant" funding option with a 100% profit split. These aggressive offers are backed by a multi-year history and the recent acquisition of another entity, though they come with complex risk rules like trailing drawdowns in certain accounts (QT ONE and Instant) and specific consistency requirements for its high-payout plans. For example, a $50,000 QT Power account costs $200, whereas Velotrade offers a $50,000 Classic 2-Step for $419.
Velotrade promises a more "professional" risk environment with static drawdowns that do not trail profits, which is often preferred by experienced traders. However, since the firm only started in 2025, this promise of stability is yet to be backed by the same volume of long-term payouts that a firm from 2023 can claim. Velotrade also enforces a strict "qualifying day" rule where traders must earn at least 0.8% profit to count a day toward their minimum trading requirements, a higher bar than QT Funded’s 0.5% requirement in its QT TWO plan.
How they handle your money
The approach to financial operations reflects their different geographical and technological focuses. QT Funded shows high operational maturity by supporting various payment and payout methods, including Credit Cards, Bank Transfers, PayPal, and Crypto. They offer cycles as short as 4 days for certain accounts, backed by a traditional brokerage setup with Quant Tekel.
Velotrade is strictly crypto-oriented for payouts, using the Arbitrum network (USDC/USDT). While this limits the options for traders who prefer bank wires, Velotrade backs its payout promises with public verifiability on Arbiscan, allowing anyone to see the transaction history on the blockchain. However, Velotrade has a restrictive cap on the first two withdrawals (20 times the fee paid), a limitation not present in QT Funded’s standard terms.
Operational maturity
QT Funded’s maturity is evident in its platform variety, offering MetaTrader 5, cTrader, and TradeLocker. This provides a familiar environment for most retail traders. Velotrade has opted for a more modern, browser-based approach by using DXtrade exclusively. While QT Funded permits a broader range of styles and has an established "add-on" system to customize accounts (like removing swaps or increasing splits), Velotrade is more restrictive, explicitly banning strategies like Martingale and Grid, which QT Funded does not explicitly list as prohibited, though it does warn against "toxic" behaviors.
What the record does and does not tell you
The record shows that QT Funded is a more established player with a massive user base and a traditional corporate structure, while Velotrade is a newcomer attempting to differentiate itself through blockchain transparency and static risk rules. However, a high number of reviews for QT Funded does not guarantee future performance, and the "blocked" status of Velotrade on review sites might simply be a result of their early stage or specific platform disputes rather than a definitive sign of service quality. Each trader must weigh QT’s proven volume against Velotrade’s modern but less-tested technical framework.
Frequently asked questions
Which firm is more affordable for a 100,000 USD two-step evaluation, QT Funded or Velotrade?
QT Funded is significantly more affordable for this specific account size. Its "QT TWO" 100k account is priced at $550, whereas the "Classic 2-Step" from Velotrade costs $769. This difference reflects QT Funded's more competitive pricing in the traditional evaluation market compared to Velotrade's higher-cost entry.
Does QT Funded or Velotrade offer a better profit split for successful traders?
QT Funded offers a higher potential profit split, reaching up to 100% in its "QT INSTANT" plan and a standard 80% on evaluation plans (upgradeable to 90% via add-ons). Velotrade starts with a standard 80% split, which can also be increased to 90% if the specific add-on is purchased at the start of the challenge.
Which firm provides more platform options for trading, QT Funded or Velotrade?
QT Funded provides more variety, offering three different platforms: MetaTrader 5, cTrader, and TradeLocker. In contrast, Velotrade currently only supports DXtrade, which may limit traders who are accustomed to the specialized tools or EAs available on the MetaTrader or cTrader ecosystems.
Between QT Funded and Velotrade, which one allows for more diverse payout methods?
QT Funded is more diverse, allowing traders to withdraw their profits via Crypto, Bank Transfer, or Card. Velotrade is much more specialized and restricted in this regard, as it only processes payouts in cryptocurrency (USDC or USDT) specifically through the Arbitrum network.





















